redrisingphoenix: (Hmph!)
[personal profile] redrisingphoenix
I was going to respond to the main thread with this, but figured it prudent not to. I already know I'm marked, and if I'm correct, there's no point in giving them a bigger reason to off me tomorrow night.

I'm not sure about Lady Tot, but... she was awfully quick to incriminate Omi. And he did have three votes on him for the suspicion poll, at least one of which we know to be hers.

And if we're to believe Wolfram's clue, and not take it as a blatent attempt to try and scapegoat Raito, it could be used against her, too - she said in her conversation with Omi that she worked as a bodyguard, not as a killer, although it was pretty clear that killing was part of her job. And she failed to mention that in an attempt to pin the title of 'killer' on him.

I was hoping we'd be right about Omi, and that I could believe Lady Tot, but... evidence is starting to mount against her.

Date: 2005-10-05 04:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Hmm... so that narrows it down to Ketchum, Impulse, Miss Hasegawa, Miss Tetra, Miss Tot and Miss Addams, provided nobody is lying...

Date: 2005-10-05 04:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
From: The Shepherd
Subject: CFUW Game 5
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 19:10:26 -0800

A wife may be unfaithful to her husband, but it doesn't mean she'll betray the flock.

There's the validation you asked for.

And yes, provided no one is lying. I don't know what to make of Wolfram just yet - you know him, don't you? What do you think of him and Raito?

If it's him or Lady Tot... they're being very blatant. Although, really, it wouldn't surprise me with Lady Tot.

Date: 2005-10-05 04:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
I spoke with Sir von Bielefeld earlier, and asked for confirmation of his clue. He gave it to me without a fight.

Miss Tot... does seem the type to do so. So if she's one, we've got three more to go.

Date: 2005-10-05 04:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Then I'd be willing to say his is genuine.

How's he so sure Raito's a killer, anyway? I'm not sure how long Lady Huang would stay with someone if she knew that.

Then I'm willing to lay money down on Lady Tot. I just wanted to see if anyone else had anything to bring to the table.

Date: 2005-10-05 04:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
... Eros is blindfolded, I've come to believe.

I think Miss Tetra could be one as well... that Captain clue was a pretty straight-giver away! Well, we could bet both her and Raito are wolves... then there's two left.

Date: 2005-10-05 05:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Or it could be Wednesday. (

I'd almost say that's too blatent, but... damn. It's like she *wants* to be suspected.

And Ari's clue said 'a professional wolf' - so it can't be both Tetra and Raito, if he's the Killer. It would have to be one or the other. We've not looked much at Tetra, this is true.

So... go for Lady Tot first, then one of them? Maybe more clues will present themselves in the meantime? And if it's Lady Tot, it clears Raito, Wednesday, and Tetra.

Who do you want to go for first?

Date: 2005-10-05 05:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Well, process of elimination is always the best way to go~! Miss Tot is just going to have to bear with us this one time.

Date: 2005-10-05 05:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
I'm going to feel really bad if I'm wrong about this - it was my fault she got voted out by accident last time. And we can't afford to lose any more sheep, dammit.

But she does have the most evidence against her at this point. I think she's our best bet.

Date: 2005-10-05 05:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Losing sheep would narrow down the wolves, though...

Hmm. Let's take a shot~!

Date: 2005-10-05 05:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
I think it's worth a shot, but... I still don't like being wrong about this stuff.

I hope we're right this time, although I definitely have the feeling we will be - why else would Lady Tot want to hide that she was a killer?

Date: 2005-10-05 05:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
I don't believe Miss Tot would hide something like that... perhaps she's telling the truth, but I still think there's a little something fishy about her whole defense~!

Date: 2005-10-05 05:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Yeah, I know what you're saying - there's something off about the whole thing.

Maybe she doesn't want others to know she's killed, but... she was very eager to point out that it was what Omi did.

Date: 2005-10-05 05:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
She seems to know Tsukiyono the best, but that's hardly accountable. She's smart enough to know not to drag personal baggage into a silly little game~!

Date: 2005-10-05 05:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Yeah - Athrun did that my first game and turned out to be a wolf. That's why I look at stuff like that. I was probably a little more sympathetic to Lady Tot because we had similar situations, but... I don't think I'd have called Xingba out like that if a clue could rightly apply to both of us.

Date: 2005-10-05 05:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Xingba? I'm afraid I haven't been following up very closely on the previous games. I've had no knowledge on this whole thing up until this experience!

Date: 2005-10-05 05:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Xingba - Gan Ning. The man who killed my father. He's in camp, too, you know. He's not played any of these games, though.

I'm just saying, since our situations are similar, that I wouldn't handle it like she's handled it. Things like that have no relavance in this game - they hold on bearing on who's picked to be a wolf. It's all random.

Date: 2005-10-05 05:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Ah, it's clearer to me now~! Hmm, it would be almost insane not to go with her with all this blinding evidence.

Date: 2005-10-05 04:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Yes, I was wondering why more people did not suspect her in the first place, though perhaps, as Omi said, it's simply her nature to act in such a manner.

Of course, that's how Ash managed to stay so long in our last game.

Date: 2005-10-05 04:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Yeah - I was willing to give her a little slack yesterday. I know if Xingba was in the game, even if I'd otherwise have no reason to doubt him, if the clue said 'pirate', and it was between him and Tetra? I'd go for him.

It would be a great cover, wouldn't it?

Date: 2005-10-05 05:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
There's also the chance that it could be Addams. She even seemed a little disappointed not to be on the "killers" list...

But yes, Tot is the most suspicious of the lot.

Date: 2005-10-05 05:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
I'd agree.

And I saw that. I'm wondering if she'd be that blatent if she was a wolf, but it is suspicious.

Like I said to Murata, I think we should go for Lady Tot first. There's a lot more evidence against her at this point.

Date: 2005-10-05 05:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
I will suspect her as well. Let us hope that we've picked the right killer this time, mm?

Date: 2005-10-05 05:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
I am. And I already cast my vote on her.

We can't afford to lose many more sheep - we have to get the right wolf out four times, and the wolves have to get sheep voted out four times. We've voted two of our own out already - if we're wrong this time, we'll only have one more chance to keep the game going.

Date: 2005-10-05 05:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
It's a calculated risk, but one worth taking.

May I ask what you think of young Alphonse?

Date: 2005-10-05 06:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Lady Huang validated his clue already. I saw it, too. Unless he was lying about it, but he didn't seem to be.

I think he's honest so far, but... I've been wrong before. My focus is off of him at the moment, at least, but he may be worth coming back to in the future if we're out of other options.

And although it's a risky move, if Lady Tot is proven to be a wolf, then it *does* shed some suspicion on his clue and his motives. Now that I think about it... I'm glad you brought it up. We should keep him in mind, then.

Date: 2005-10-05 06:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Actually, I was thinking he would be more suspicious if she turns out not to be the wolf, since Alphonse's clue casts a negative light on her.

Date: 2005-10-05 09:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Do you see it that way?

I suppose if he was a wolf and she wasn't, it could be taken as mocking her.

And now that I think about it... what wolf would validate another wolf with a clue? Just like Lady Huang said - if one goes, the other is discredited.

Actually, now that you mention it... you may be right.


redrisingphoenix: (Default)
Ling Tong (Gongji) ✯ 凌統 公績

August 2008

3 456789
1718 1920212223

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 21st, 2017 09:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios