![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Il Palazzo, Murata:
Oct. 5th, 2005 12:27 amI was going to respond to the main thread with this, but figured it prudent not to. I already know I'm marked, and if I'm correct, there's no point in giving them a bigger reason to off me tomorrow night.
I'm not sure about Lady Tot, but... she was awfully quick to incriminate Omi. And he did have three votes on him for the suspicion poll, at least one of which we know to be hers.
And if we're to believe Wolfram's clue, and not take it as a blatent attempt to try and scapegoat Raito, it could be used against her, too - she said in her conversation with Omi that she worked as a bodyguard, not as a killer, although it was pretty clear that killing was part of her job. And she failed to mention that in an attempt to pin the title of 'killer' on him.
I was hoping we'd be right about Omi, and that I could believe Lady Tot, but... evidence is starting to mount against her.
I'm not sure about Lady Tot, but... she was awfully quick to incriminate Omi. And he did have three votes on him for the suspicion poll, at least one of which we know to be hers.
And if we're to believe Wolfram's clue, and not take it as a blatent attempt to try and scapegoat Raito, it could be used against her, too - she said in her conversation with Omi that she worked as a bodyguard, not as a killer, although it was pretty clear that killing was part of her job. And she failed to mention that in an attempt to pin the title of 'killer' on him.
I was hoping we'd be right about Omi, and that I could believe Lady Tot, but... evidence is starting to mount against her.
