Il Palazzo, Murata:
Oct. 5th, 2005 12:27 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I was going to respond to the main thread with this, but figured it prudent not to. I already know I'm marked, and if I'm correct, there's no point in giving them a bigger reason to off me tomorrow night.
I'm not sure about Lady Tot, but... she was awfully quick to incriminate Omi. And he did have three votes on him for the suspicion poll, at least one of which we know to be hers.
And if we're to believe Wolfram's clue, and not take it as a blatent attempt to try and scapegoat Raito, it could be used against her, too - she said in her conversation with Omi that she worked as a bodyguard, not as a killer, although it was pretty clear that killing was part of her job. And she failed to mention that in an attempt to pin the title of 'killer' on him.
I was hoping we'd be right about Omi, and that I could believe Lady Tot, but... evidence is starting to mount against her.
I'm not sure about Lady Tot, but... she was awfully quick to incriminate Omi. And he did have three votes on him for the suspicion poll, at least one of which we know to be hers.
And if we're to believe Wolfram's clue, and not take it as a blatent attempt to try and scapegoat Raito, it could be used against her, too - she said in her conversation with Omi that she worked as a bodyguard, not as a killer, although it was pretty clear that killing was part of her job. And she failed to mention that in an attempt to pin the title of 'killer' on him.
I was hoping we'd be right about Omi, and that I could believe Lady Tot, but... evidence is starting to mount against her.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 04:45 am (UTC)To: sailorN1@aol.com
Subject: CFUW Game 5
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 19:10:26 -0800
A wife may be unfaithful to her husband, but it doesn't mean she'll betray the flock.
There's the validation you asked for.
And yes, provided no one is lying. I don't know what to make of Wolfram just yet - you know him, don't you? What do you think of him and Raito?
If it's him or Lady Tot... they're being very blatant. Although, really, it wouldn't surprise me with Lady Tot.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 04:48 am (UTC)Miss Tot... does seem the type to do so. So if she's one, we've got three more to go.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 04:52 am (UTC)How's he so sure Raito's a killer, anyway? I'm not sure how long Lady Huang would stay with someone if she knew that.
Then I'm willing to lay money down on Lady Tot. I just wanted to see if anyone else had anything to bring to the table.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 04:54 am (UTC)I think Miss Tetra could be one as well... that Captain clue was a pretty straight-giver away! Well, we could bet both her and Raito are wolves... then there's two left.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:05 am (UTC)I'd almost say that's too blatent, but... damn. It's like she *wants* to be suspected.
And Ari's clue said 'a professional wolf' - so it can't be both Tetra and Raito, if he's the Killer. It would have to be one or the other. We've not looked much at Tetra, this is true.
So... go for Lady Tot first, then one of them? Maybe more clues will present themselves in the meantime? And if it's Lady Tot, it clears Raito, Wednesday, and Tetra.
Who do you want to go for first?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:13 am (UTC)But she does have the most evidence against her at this point. I think she's our best bet.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:25 am (UTC)Hmm. Let's take a shot~!
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:28 am (UTC)I hope we're right this time, although I definitely have the feeling we will be - why else would Lady Tot want to hide that she was a killer?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:38 am (UTC)Maybe she doesn't want others to know she's killed, but... she was very eager to point out that it was what Omi did.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:52 am (UTC)I'm just saying, since our situations are similar, that I wouldn't handle it like she's handled it. Things like that have no relavance in this game - they hold on bearing on who's picked to be a wolf. It's all random.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 04:43 am (UTC)Of course, that's how Ash managed to stay so long in our last game.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 04:49 am (UTC)It would be a great cover, wouldn't it?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:03 am (UTC)But yes, Tot is the most suspicious of the lot.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:07 am (UTC)And I saw that. I'm wondering if she'd be that blatent if she was a wolf, but it is suspicious.
Like I said to Murata, I think we should go for Lady Tot first. There's a lot more evidence against her at this point.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:15 am (UTC)We can't afford to lose many more sheep - we have to get the right wolf out four times, and the wolves have to get sheep voted out four times. We've voted two of our own out already - if we're wrong this time, we'll only have one more chance to keep the game going.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 05:58 am (UTC)May I ask what you think of young Alphonse?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 06:04 am (UTC)I think he's honest so far, but... I've been wrong before. My focus is off of him at the moment, at least, but he may be worth coming back to in the future if we're out of other options.
And although it's a risky move, if Lady Tot is proven to be a wolf, then it *does* shed some suspicion on his clue and his motives. Now that I think about it... I'm glad you brought it up. We should keep him in mind, then.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 09:55 am (UTC)I suppose if he was a wolf and she wasn't, it could be taken as mocking her.
And now that I think about it... what wolf would validate another wolf with a clue? Just like Lady Huang said - if one goes, the other is discredited.
Actually, now that you mention it... you may be right.