Il Palazzo, Murata:

[redrisingphoenix]

I was going to respond to the main thread with this, but figured it prudent not to. I already know I'm marked, and if I'm correct, there's no point in giving them a bigger reason to off me tomorrow night.

I'm not sure about Lady Tot, but... she was awfully quick to incriminate Omi. And he did have three votes on him for the suspicion poll, at least one of which we know to be hers.

And if we're to believe Wolfram's clue, and not take it as a blatent attempt to try and scapegoat Raito, it could be used against her, too - she said in her conversation with Omi that she worked as a bodyguard, not as a killer, although it was pretty clear that killing was part of her job. And she failed to mention that in an attempt to pin the title of 'killer' on him.

I was hoping we'd be right about Omi, and that I could believe Lady Tot, but... evidence is starting to mount against her.

Comments

[ilpacock.livejournal.com]

There's also the chance that it could be Addams. She even seemed a little disappointed not to be on the "killers" list...

But yes, Tot is the most suspicious of the lot.

[redrisngphoenix.livejournal.com]

I'd agree.

And I saw that. I'm wondering if she'd be that blatent if she was a wolf, but it is suspicious.

Like I said to Murata, I think we should go for Lady Tot first. There's a lot more evidence against her at this point.

[ilpacock.livejournal.com]

I will suspect her as well. Let us hope that we've picked the right killer this time, mm?

[redrisngphoenix.livejournal.com]

I am. And I already cast my vote on her.

We can't afford to lose many more sheep - we have to get the right wolf out four times, and the wolves have to get sheep voted out four times. We've voted two of our own out already - if we're wrong this time, we'll only have one more chance to keep the game going.

[ilpacock.livejournal.com]

It's a calculated risk, but one worth taking.

May I ask what you think of young Alphonse?

[redrisngphoenix.livejournal.com]

Lady Huang validated his clue already. I saw it, too. Unless he was lying about it, but he didn't seem to be.

I think he's honest so far, but... I've been wrong before. My focus is off of him at the moment, at least, but he may be worth coming back to in the future if we're out of other options.

And although it's a risky move, if Lady Tot is proven to be a wolf, then it *does* shed some suspicion on his clue and his motives. Now that I think about it... I'm glad you brought it up. We should keep him in mind, then.

[ilpacock.livejournal.com]

Actually, I was thinking he would be more suspicious if she turns out not to be the wolf, since Alphonse's clue casts a negative light on her.

[redrisngphoenix.livejournal.com]

Do you see it that way?

I suppose if he was a wolf and she wasn't, it could be taken as mocking her.

And now that I think about it... what wolf would validate another wolf with a clue? Just like Lady Huang said - if one goes, the other is discredited.

Actually, now that you mention it... you may be right.